Piggyback or Cava Replacement: Which Implantation Technique Protects Liver Recipients From Acute Kidney Injury and Complications?
Jeannette D. Widmer, Andrea Schlegel, Mohamed Ghazaly, Brian Richie Davidson, Charles Imber, Dinesh Sharma, Massimo Malago, Joerg‐Matthias Pollok – 19 September 2018 – The cava‐preserving piggyback (PB) technique requires only partial cava clamping during the anhepatic phase in liver transplantation (LT) and, therefore, maintains venous return and may hemodynamically stabilize the recipient. Hence, it is an ongoing debate whether PB implantation is more protective from acute kidney injury (AKI) after LT when compared with a classic cava replacement (CR) technique.